The following table summarizes the current status of PPSkit. For each
architecture the questions Compiles?
/Works OK?
are
answered. Possible choices are Y for Yes
(non-SMP)
, S for Yes (even
SMP)
, and N for No
.
For Support Status
the possible choices are Y for
Yes (current branch)
, C for Conditionally (if you
can convince me)
, and N for No (sources probably
unavailable)
.
| PPSkit | Linux | Support Status | Architectures | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| alpha | arm | i386 | m68k | mips | ppc | s390 | sparc | sparc64 | |||
| Implemented additional PPS API sanity checks | |||||||||||
| 1.1.0 | 2.2.19 | Y | ?/? | ?/? | S/S | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? |
| Implemented ``nanokernel #4'' (dated 2000-09-21) | |||||||||||
| 1.0.3 | 2.2.18 | C | ?/? | ?/? | S/S | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? |
| Implemented ``nanokernel #3'' (dated 1999-08-29) | |||||||||||
| 0.9.3 | 2.2.16 | C | Y/Y | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? |
| Implemented ``PPS API'' from ``draft-05'' (RFC 2783) | |||||||||||
| 0.8.1 | 2.2.12 | C | ?/? | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |
| Implemented ``PPS API'' from ``draft-03'' | |||||||||||
| 0.7.2 | 2.2.12 | N | N/N | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |
| Implemented first ``nanokernel'' with nanosecond resolution | |||||||||||
| 0.6.1 | 2.2.6 | N | ?/? | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |
| Made NTP and PPS stuff configurable | |||||||||||
| 0.5.2 | 2.2.4 | N | N/N | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |
| Merged from Linux 2.0 to Linux 2.2 | |||||||||||
| 0.4.2 | 2.2.0 | N | ?/? | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |
| 0.3.10 | 2.0.36 | N | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |||
| 0.3.3 | 2.0.31 | N | ?/? | Y/Y | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | ?/? | |||
As I am unable to test architectures other than i386 I
appreciate any updates to the above table very much.
Please keep in mind that the version of the NTP software has to be compatible with the kernel implementation.
Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de